CASE DIGEST ON In Re: KAY VILLEGAS KAMI [35 SCRA 429 (1970)]
November 10, 2010
Facts: Kay Villegas Kami Inc. claiming to be a recognized non-stock, non-profit corporation contests validity of RA # 6132 Sec. 8 saying it violates due process rights of association, freedom of expression and is an ex post facto law
1. WON it violates three rights?
No. It’s set up to prevent prostitution of electoral process and equal protection of laws.
2. WON it is an ex post facto law?
No. Ex post facto law defined:
a. makes criminal an act done before law was passed and punishes act innocent when done.
b. aggravates a crime, makes it greater than it was
c. inflicts greater punishment than the law prescribed when committed
d. alters legal rules of evidence and authorizes conviction upon less or different tests
e. assuming to regulate civil rights and remedies only in effect imposes penalty or deprivation of right which when done was lawful
f. deprives a person accused of a crime some lawful protection to which he has become entitled, such as the protection of a former conviction of acquittal or a proclamation of amnesty.
Held: Petition denied. Constitutional act.
Constitutional inhibition refers only to criminal laws. Penalty in law imposed to acts committed after approval of law
CLICK HERE for the latest 2nd Hand Laptops, Mobile Phones, SMART/ GLOBE /TALK 'N TEXT/ TOUCH MOBILE / SUN CELLULAR postpaid, pre-paid and roaming PROMOS, Philippine Airlines (PAL) and Cebu Pacific Airlines Airline AIRFARE DISCOUNT tickets for sale!Check out our Updated/Latest List of GOVERNMENT JOBS AND OTHER GOVERNMENT VACANT POSITIONS, PRIVATE JOBS, PRIVATE FULL-TIME JOBS, PRIVATE PART-TIME JOBS and OTHER ONLINE JOBS in this link!